We've all sniffed food in
the fridge that’s just edged past its use-by date, and wondered whether it was
safe to eat or use in any way. Whether it’s cheese that’s become dusty with
mould, milk that’s firmly on the side of sour or meat that’s gone a little
translucent with age, we’ve all wondered whether to tuck in - or bin. Of
course, you should always be careful about food safety, especially if you’re
elderly, pregnant or in poor health. However, I couldn’t help but feel that the
Food Standards Agency was over-reacting a tad this week, when they issued a
dramatic warning that many of us are gambling with our health through
indifference and ignorance over what we eat. According to the Agency, no fewer
than 40 per cent of consumers are prepared to eat food that is past its use-by
date, while more than two-thirds of people check the safety of products simply
by sniffing them or examining their colour - though both these tests are
hopelessly unreliable.
The Agency argues that, partly as a result of this
casual approach, Britain is suffering an epidemic of food poisoning, with 1.7
million cases now occurring every year. While they’re right to draw
attention to the need for hygiene in the kitchen and better adherence to use-by
dates, it is wrong for them to heap all the blame for the poisoning epidemic on
the consumer, since much of the food that we buy from the supermarkets -
particularly raw meat - is already dangerously contaminated, thanks to
intensive factory farming. As well as this, though, there can be some
flexibility with the dates on our food. Use-by dates are, of course, an
integral part of our modern food distribution, whereby supermarkets like to
promote the concept of the ‘weekly shop’. In this culture of ‘stocking up’ for
several days ahead, an illusion of freshness is provided by vast, high-tech
fridges. But the reality is that the traditional pattern of consumption was
actually far safer, when produce was usually eaten on the same day it was
purchased because of lack of refrigeration. But use-by dates are here to
stay. They are an inevitable part of our urbanised, retail society and it is
foolish to ignore them. What is crucial to understand, though, is the
difference between use-by and best-before labels - something that often seems
to confuse consumers. Use-by means that it can be dangerous to eat the
product after the specified date, whereas best-before merely means that the
food will be at its peak of tastiness before this date, but will not be unsafe
afterwards. So digestive biscuits or oatcakes might become a little soft
after the best-before date, but would still be perfectly harmless, for example.
With so much information and advice around, how can we be certain what is safe
to eat? There is certainly a grey area - below is a guide to some of the basic
principles that should keep you safe in the kitchen...
SALTY MEANS SAFE
As a general rule, things
that are very salty (pickles for example), sugary (honey or jam), fermented
(sauerkraut) or dried (biscuits) are very low-risk. Why? Well, essentially,
there are five ways of killing bacteria to ensure the safety of food. First,
food can be preserved in acidic liquids like vinegar, the process that gives us
pickles. You can eat pickles long after the date on the jar.
Second, using large amounts
of sugar can be a very effective method of preservation, which is the reason
that very sweet products like fruitcake and fudge can be eaten well past their
best-before date. Indeed, some 5,000-year-old honey recently found in Egypt has
proved to be both edible and perfectly harmless.
Third, the process of
fermentation, used in dishes like the German favourite sauerkraut, also preserves
food effectively, as do the traditional methods of salting, curing and drying
meat and fish.
Properly made Italian
salami - not the water-filled, modern commercial type - can last a whole year,
just becoming progressively more dry as the months pass, but still remaining
good to eat.
Lastly, and most simply,
thoroughly cooking any product will destroy most bacteria, as they cannot
survive extreme heat.
For example, where meat has
darkened because of exposure to air, it needn’t be binned. Just cook it at a
high heat and it should be absolutely fine.
However, a word of warning.
Despite what some people think, washing meat under a tap makes no difference to
the bacteria contained within. Indeed, it can even be positively
counter-productive, by spreading that bacteria to the kitchen sink, surfaces
and cloths.
SOUR MILK? LOVELY
Use-by labels should be
kept to for most fresh foods, especially where meat is involved, but there are
some instances where they can be ignored.
Hard cheese like cheddar is
one. Even if it’s turned mouldy on the outside, the exterior can just be cut
off and the interior consumed. The same principle applies to bread.
The same, however, is not
true of soft cheeses like brie or camembert, which can foster harmful bacteria
once they have lost their freshness.
Surprisingly, use-by dates
are not too much of a worry with eggs. They can still be used in a sponge cake
or hardboiled in a salad long after the benchmark has been passed, though they
should not be eaten scrambled, fried or soft-boiled if they have been left for
too long.
In the same vein, sour milk
makes great pancakes. The act of cooking the milk will kill off any harmful
bacteria present. In fact, I had a relative who would deliberately leave her
milk to go sour because she loved the way it made her pancakes taste.
DON'T BE CHICKEN
Under no circumstances
should any meats be consumed past their use-by dates. Poultry and pork are by
far the biggest sources of food poisoning in Britain, a problem worsened by
factory farming methods that spread contamination.
A recent report by the
campaign group Compassion In World Farming showed that the chronic stress
imposed on intensively reared animals severely reduces the effectiveness of
their immune systems, making them more prone to becoming riddled with harmful
bacteria.
In contrast, it was found
that, with free-range animals, dangerous bacteria tend to remain in the gut
rather than penetrating the meat, while their ability to forage outdoors inhibited
the growth of the E.coli virus.
Similarly, animals living
outdoors benefit from sunlight which deactivates many bacteria, especially
those that spread swine and avian flu. The UV rays in the sunlight kill the
bacteria off.
Personally, I would not eat
any factory-farmed meat, even if it was well before its use-by date. Real
safety can only be obtained with fresh, free-range produce. Factory-farmed
supermarket chicken is a real no-no for me.
Why? Incredibly, two-thirds
of all the fresh chicken on sale in Britain is already contaminated with the
campylobacter bacteria. At its worst, this can be fatal, especially for the
physically frail and the elderly. It is estimated that every year around 100
Britons are killed by campylobacter alone.
So, you can see why I say that
carefully controlled use-by dates, rigorous hand-washing and the cleanest
kitchen in the world will not combat the consequences of industrialised mass
food production.
Indeed, this is why I
believe ready meals and packaged sandwiches can be dangerous, regardless of
their use-by dates.
Many sandwiches sold in
places like petrol stations are put together in huge factories. They can then
sit around for days before being trucked across the country. Moreover, their
ingredients, especially cooked chicken or prawns, carry a heavy risk of harmful
bacteria.
Furthermore, microwaving
convenience meals is nothing like as safe as cooking thoroughly in the oven,
because a microwave doesn’t always give an even temperature throughout. If you
have to microwave food, give it a longer cooking time than the packet advises,
leave it to stand and make sure it’s warm through.
However, I do think
supermarkets can also be too generous with their ‘best-before’ timescales. A
classic example is nuts, which are full of oil and therefore become rancid,
though still harmless, if they are left too long.
I certainly wouldn’t try
one after the best-before date. If you’ve ever tasted a rancid walnut, you’ll
know what I mean!
1 comment:
There are a number of reckless claims made in this article. As someone that studied microbiology from an Environmental Health persepctive at uni, I can set some of this straight. This one in particular:
" Just cook it at a high heat and it should be absolutely fine."
- Not true. Any food that is infected with bacteria that produces toxins cannot be cooked out. Toxins are resistant to heat.
People are obsessed with raw meat, but other food is more risky than meat. Unwashed salad can be high risk. Often due to cross-contamination with cooked or raw meat in the fridge and also as E-coli lives in soil where the salad grew. Good food prep and proper storage are key. Get this right and the risks are low - Provided you stick closely to the use-by date that is. Finally all this tripe in the article about factory-production is just snobbery. My EH colleagues tell me stories about dodgy restaurants and butchers, etc. Rarely is there a problem in a factory. I agree about animal welfare, but the risk of poisoning from this food is low. Believe me, I have seen many factories first hand and seen the processes and procedures. They are very good.
Post a Comment